Difference between revisions of "Open Science Repository at the Information and Communication Services Group at the University of Rostock"

Fieldbus traffic

• Fieldbus traffic simulation logs Benchmark collection for fieldbus attacks
• On ship data traffic from NMEA 0183 and NMEA 2000 bus devices and engine data from its CAN bus.

Location

• GPX dataset Movement data grabbed from gpsies.com (used for talk on ICSC 2012)
• RSS feeds grabbed over two month in 2010 from Gpsies.com, Bikemap.net and OpenStreetMap.org
• GPS tracks of a handfull anonymous people.

Privacy

• DiHabs survey results
• DiLES evaluation results
• Washroom behaviour - KNX data from office building and software for particle filter.
• Audio files and analysis software from contactless wiretapping KNX

Wireless networks

• OLSR Messages mainly containing Topology Control messages and some Hello messages. Collected from Opennet roof top network.
• Link Quality between nodes of a roof top network in Rostock together with location of nodes. Collected from Opennet root top network in 2008 and 2009.
• Geographical position of nodes forming a roof top network. Collected from Opennet root top network in 2008 and 2009.
• Link Quality for an entire OLSR mesh network collected over one week. Resolution 1 minute.
• Extensive Network quality measurements from a wireless ad hoc network (Opennet).

Network Neutrality

• Neutrality violation examples from various scenarios

• DiHabs - Disclosure Habits Survey System
• DiLES - Disclosure Learning Evaluation System
• thmONAG - Opennet Network Analytics with Google App Engine

• Routing with Predicted Network Conditions
• Solarnode Telemetry
• Social Networks
• Opennet
• Intrusion Detection in Fieldbuses

• Thomas Mundt
• Simeon Wiedenmann
• Johannes Goltz
• Till (former employee)
• Steffen (former employee)
• Martin (former employee)
• Henry (former employee)
• Christian (former employee)

• Anonymous reviewer for one of Till's and Thomas' papers: "It is very good that the authors make their data available. It might also be worthwhile to look into the CRAWDAD repository, also as a source for data to compare with."

These principles were drafted by Science Commons and presented at Policy and Technology for e-Science, a satellite workshop that took place in conjunction with the Euroscience Open Forum (ESOF) 2008.

http://sciencecommons.org/resources/readingroom/principles-for-open-science/

Open Access to Literature from Funded Research

By "open access" to this literature, we mean that it should be on the internet in digital form, with permission granted in advance to users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."

Access to Research Tools from Funded Research

By "access" to research tools, we mean that the materials necessary to replicate funded research - cell lines, model animals, DNA tools, reagents, and more, should be described in digital formats, made available under standard terms of use or contracts, with infrastructure or resources to fulfill requests to qualified scientists, and with full credit provided to the scientist who created the tools.

Data from Funded Research in the Public Domain

Research data, data sets, databases, and protocols should be in the public domain. This status ensures the ability to freely distribute, copy, re-format, and integrate data from research into new research, ensuring that as new technologies are developed that researchers can apply those technologies without legal barriers. Scientific traditions of citation, attribution, and acknowledgment should be cultivated in norms.

Invest in Open Cyberinfrastructure

Data without structure and annotation is a lost opportunity. Research data should flow into an open, public, and extensible infrastructure that supports its recombination and reconfiguration into computer models, its searchability by search engines, and its use by both scientists and the taxpaying public. This infrastructure should be treated as an essential public good.